![]() In the future, that might no longer be the case. ![]() In the past, when dictators fell from power, at least what they left behind them was still human. This is what ruthless dictators have been dreaming of. This might excite some transhumanists, who dream utopian dreams, and the scientists who are focussed on using these tools for solving narrow, specific problems in their fields, but Harari strikes a more sombre tone. Will we still be able to understand those as natural? As part of a similar trajectory, we are about to start changing our biological makeup, changing our nature, if you like, in radical ways. We are on the verge of creating what Harari called “inorganic lifeforms”, referring to advanced Artificial Intelligence. _ We are on the verge of creating what Harari called “inorganic lifeforms”.īut all this might be about to be put to a test. When homosexuality was considered “unnatural”, Harari reminded the audience, that was a political statement, and a misguided one at that: nature on its own doesn’t yield moral rules, it doesn’t tell us what’s right and what’s wrong. And the way we appeal to nature is deeply ideological. ![]() What we refer to as “nature” today and what we referred to as “nature” in the 16 th century are not the same thing. On the other hand, Žižek stressed, what we call “nature” is always culturally mediated. Their existence doesn’t violate any natural law and they are made of the same physical stuff as everything else. Even today it sounds strange to our ears to call a nuclear reactor or the COVID vaccine, or the war in Ukraine “natural”. Despite being a self-proclaimed Hegelian, even Žižek said “I’m not an idealist, I’m a naturalist!” It might not seem such an original thought, but over the past few centuries, our scientific and technological successes had convinced us that humans are somehow above nature, masters of the universe. The idea that all that exists can be understood as part of nature has been around since antiquity but still animates much contemporary philosophy. The agreement, that surprised the speakers (“When will the knives come out?” wondered Žižek) continued when both of them seemed to argue that the distinction between the natural and the non-natural was itself, well, artificial. _ Despite being a self-proclaimed Hegelian, even Žižek said “I’m not an idealist, I’m a naturalist!” Žižek went further still, and in his usual colourful way, undermined the image of a nurturing nature with the line “If nature is our mother, then she’s a bitch!” As for the vengeance part, the universe is indifferent towards us. Nature is neither good nor bad – it’s outside of morality. Nonsense, proclaimed Harari and Žižek in agreement. But being confronted with it once again has meant that people have interpreted nature either as inherently good, in contrast to the morally corrupt humans, or as vengeful, punishing us for our hubris in exploiting the environment. The COVID pandemic and the climate crisis are both reminders that we have neither fully understood nature, nor taken conclusive ownership and control over it. Because we’re about to enter a post-nature era, and that will change everything.Īfter a long period of Enlightenment thought that saw nature conquered by reason and tamed by technology, its place in society is back on the agenda in a big way. As Zizek and Harari so often claim, everyone is failing to ask the right questions. The answer is unsurprisingly nuanced: nature is neither our friend nor our enemy. Which is what brought them to HowTheLightGetsIn at Hay, the world’s biggest philosophy festival, to debate the question of nature: friend or foe. The world, it seems, wants to know what they think on all the most pressing issues of our times, from the war in Ukraine to the climate crisis and our posthuman future. Both thinkers have found popular success beyond the narrow confines of their academic specializations – medieval history for Harari, Hegelian philosophy and Lacanian psychoanalysis for Žižek. If there is such a thing as celebrity intellectuals, Yuval Noah Harari and Slavoj Žižek fit the bill better than most - even if the latter flinches at being called one. Yuval Noah Harari and Slavoj Žižek debate the nature of nature. It’s what comes next: a world post-nature. Is it an existential threat to us, or a source we can continue using freely to improve our lives? It’s not nature we should be worried about, both thinkers agreed. On a fine summer day In Hay, at the packed main stage of HowTheLightGetsIn, the world’s biggest philosophy festival, Yuval Noah Harari and Slavoj Žižek appeared together on a panel for the first time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |